[e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
daniele.athome at gmail.com
Tue Nov 23 09:13:00 CET 2010
Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler <raster at rasterman.com> wrote:
> themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data
> from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual paper,
> then you have something beginning to be believable.
What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof.
Perlin Quickwriting page:
We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one
and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor
where to find it :-(
More information about the community