[e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
openmoko at mazikeen.demon.co.uk
Tue Nov 23 13:11:37 CET 2010
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote:
> Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler <raster at rasterman.com>
> > themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such
> > data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on
> > actual paper, then you have something beginning to be believable.
> What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof.
> Perlin Quickwriting page:
> We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one
> and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor
> where to find it :-(
Ideally you want something in print with a verifiable publication date. A
printed copy of "UIST '98 - Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM Symposium on
User Interface Software and Technology"  might be available through
university libraries if you can't get it direct from ACM. I don't know whether
the 'Wired' article  made it into the print edition, but that's another one
More information about the community