QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

[giacomo 'giotti' mariani]

> Hi,
>
> I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his dicision.
>
> > From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid, because of
> following reasons:
>
> 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs
> than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to me plese)
> 2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own, rewriting qt one
> to FSO one is worthless effort
> 3. where logs of significantly more useful, easier and non-destructive
> goals to rich, i can suggest few:
> 3.1 switch back to X11. with new graphical subsystem performance this
> will work great.
> 3.2 switch to newer qt versions
> 3.3 fix 100500 bugs left
> 3.4 add gta04 support<- most important
> 3.5 improve performance and usability
> 3.6 implement new features, like: 'geek' theme, sliding buttons in
> answer screen
>
> ^^^ IMO this set can keep everyone busy for a while.
>
> where is also no real benefit visible from switching to FSO. qtmoko will
> become more complicated, more buggy, slower, harder to develop:(
>
> I afraid i'll have to stay on non-FSO version forether. And certain,
> this planned change worth more discussion. If someone wants FSO, better
> to install it on debian or with SHR.
>
> Gennady.
+1
Absolutely.

-- 
##############################################################
giacomo 'giotti' mariani
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key 0x99bfa859
O<  ASCII ribbon campaign: stop HTML mail
www.asciiribbon.org
##############################################################