QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)
Bernhard Reiter
ockham at raz.or.at
Fri Mar 11 21:38:09 CET 2011
+1.
I've only recently switched from SHR to qtmoko (v31) and I'm impressed
with performance and maturity of applications. I really wouldn't like to
lose that again.
Regards
Bernhard
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 12:00 +0100 schrieb
community-request at lists.openmoko.org:
> Von:
> Gennady Kupava <gb at bsdmn.com>
> Reply-to:
> List for Openmoko community
> discussion
> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> An:
> List for Openmoko community
> discussion
> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> Betreff:
> Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko
> v33)
> Datum:
> Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:48:28 +0300
> (2011-03-09 20:48:28)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his
> dicision.
>
> From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid,
> because of
> following reasons:
>
> 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and
> less bugs
> than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to
> me plese)
> 2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own,
> rewriting qt one
> to FSO one is worthless effort
> 3. where logs of significantly more useful, easier and
> non-destructive
> goals to rich, i can suggest few:
> 3.1 switch back to X11. with new graphical subsystem
> performance this
> will work great.
> 3.2 switch to newer qt versions
> 3.3 fix 100500 bugs left
> 3.4 add gta04 support <- most important
> 3.5 improve performance and usability
> 3.6 implement new features, like: 'geek' theme, sliding
> buttons in
> answer screen
>
> ^^^ IMO this set can keep everyone busy for a while.
>
> where is also no real benefit visible from switching to FSO.
> qtmoko will
> become more complicated, more buggy, slower, harder to
> develop :(
>
> I afraid i'll have to stay on non-FSO version forether. And
> certain,
> this planned change worth more discussion. If someone wants
> FSO, better
> to install it on debian or with SHR.
>
> Gennady.
>
> В Втр, 08/03/2011 в 18:00 +0100, Radek Polak пишет:
> > Dmitry Chistikov wrote:
> >
> > > I'm afraid it's too early to ask, but could you give an
> estimate on how
> > > much time it'll take to enable the use of FSO framework?
> Just something
> > > like "about a year" or, say, "not less than four months".
> >
> > Writing simple dialer application could be matter of
> days/hours. Integrating
> > all the functions so that it looks like qtmoko now will be
> much more difficult
> > (i cant even guess how much). We also need FSO running on
> debian - i'd prefer
> > current git version. I am not aware if there are debian
> packages for recent
> > FSO. Anyone knows?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Radek
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openmoko community mailing list
> > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
More information about the community
mailing list