<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7650.28">
<TITLE>RE: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my<BR>
>business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little<BR>
>confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here:<BR>
><A HREF="http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli">http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli</A><BR>
<BR>
Not too confusing. It's not a recent page, and the information on there was provided by members (of which FIC is not currently one, although we've invited them to participate...)<BR>
<BR>
>>Or let it me say in that way, it would be nice to read about<BR>
>OpenMoko/Neo1973 in a yearly report of OSDL/MLI, at last in the<BR>
>report about year 2007.<BR>
<BR>
No doubt, but such a yearly report would be a recap of MLI's activities, like DCL's, not a general survey of what's been going on outside the group in the world of Mobile Linux at large so much. Remember: we only first heard of OpenMoko and FIC at Open Source in Mobile 2007, back in November, and--frankly speaking--there's not really much concrete substance to say about it as yet.<BR>
<BR>
>Can you, or Sean, when it doesn't take to much time, say something about<BR>
>OpenMoko and OSDL/MLI?<BR>
<BR>
Not much, really, for the reasons cited above. OpenMoko seems like a worthy and interesting effort, and we'd welcome the participation of FIC in the Linux Foundation or in LiPS whenever they're prepared to join us.<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>