<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Martin Raißle napisał(a):
<blockquote
cite="midfb99d7c30703011515i44d285ffoeec6ceadfe5274ec@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On 3/2/07, Jonathon Suggs <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:jsuggs@murmp.com"><jsuggs@murmp.com></a> wrote: <br>
<br>
In combination of what was said before - the virus scanner - we could <br>
maybe use a database of application hashes, so not every app has to be <br>
configurated but only those that are not found in the database, maybe <br>
this will bring some focus to security to the average user, since not <br>
every app goes along with a warning. <br>
If there are too many warnings user tend to grant any right to any app.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
I'm afraid that you're going a bit too far. I thought about making
costs with illegal calls and smses. Virus protection should appear only
when viruses appear. Otherwise scanner would kill system's performance
(as NAV do in my computer and I always disable it while not installing
unknown apps).<br>
Think about average users. They don't need rating. They sometimes even
don't know exactly what spam is. It has to be as simple as possible.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<b>Bartłomiej Zdanowski</b><br>
Programista<br>
Dział Rozwoju Produktów<br>
AutoGuard & Insurance Sp. z o.o.<br>
<br>
<small>
Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego
Rejestru Sądowego <br>
KRS: 0000029534<br>
NIP PL1132219747<br>
ul. Omulewska 27 <br>
04-128 Warszawa<br>
tel. +48 22 611 69 23<br>
<a href="http://www.autoguard.pl" style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">www.autoguard.pl</a><br>
</small></div>
</body>
</html>