stupid gmail... sorry joe<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeff Andros</b> <<a href="mailto:jeff@bigredtj.com">jeff@bigredtj.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Joe Pfeiffer</b> <<a href="mailto:jjpfeifferjr@comcast.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
jjpfeifferjr@comcast.net</a>> wrote:</span></span><div><span class="e" id="q_1127cc01804e4dca_2"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Jeff Andros writes:<br><br>>Chicken and egg hoss, there's also no bluetooth remotes out yet to make it<br>>worthwhile to have a bluetooth remote... I like the suggestion of a<br><br>TV sets come with remotes so routinely that the usual chicken/egg
<br>problem doesn't seem to arise. Hmmm... which may point a different<br>direction: as long as bluetooth is more expensive than IR...<br><br></blockquote></span></div></div>my thought was if you're going to provide a bluetooth remote... it should probably be a universal one since you're jamming enough smarts to work a bluetooth stack in... it'd be killer to have a gateway system that makes everything work together, whether I'm sitting at my laptop, or just walking around with my phone in my pocket.
<br><br>it'd also be cool to not have to walk back out into the house to turn the other TV off when I decide to go to bed<br><span class="sg"><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jeff<br>O|||||||O
</span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jeff<br>O|||||||O