On 6/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jonathon Suggs</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I understand being careful with what you say, but even something like<br>"We've built X devices with a defect ratio of Y. We want that ration to<br>be Z before we push the production line full steam ahead" would be
<br>promising. That is unless X=0 Y=100 and Z is "anything greater than<br>zero", THEN we'd be a little disappointed.</blockquote></div><br><br>I also agree. But right now I do not believe we will get the phone before September/October (just a feeling). If it was a little problem, I believe they would keep us informed. I don't know why they don't inform us but I also don't know what the problem is.
<br><br>Anyway... I am really excited and I check several times each day (I have done that since January). I hope it will become available soon. If the problem is software related, I personally think they should not hold the device back. There is many great developers out here that is ready to hack the device.
<br><br>I don't want to sound negative.... I am just really excited. I think Sean and the rest of the team is working really hard now to find a solution to whatever the problem might be. They are under a lot of pressure and they don't need a lot of demotivating complains.