Actually, <a href="http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-00-stdkit.html">http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-00-stdkit.html</a> and <a href="http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-03-hardware.html">http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-03-hardware.html
</a> still state quad...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/6/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Joshua Layne</b> <<a href="mailto:joshua@willowisp.net">joshua@willowisp.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:37:39 -0800, Joshua Layne <<a href="mailto:joshua@willowisp.net">joshua@willowisp.net</a>><br>wrote:<br>> I hate to add to the fire on this one, but no 850 is a definite deal<br>> breaker.
<br>> No quad-band is a serious limitation, as it has been marketed since<br>> inception as a quad-band phone.<br><br>I see now that the <a href="http://openmoko.com">openmoko.com</a> page has been updated to state that it is a
<br>tri-band phone, not a quad-band phone - last night it clearly stated quad<br>band.<br><br>I just wish this had been clearly identified 3 or 4 months ago.<br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>OpenMoko community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:community@lists.openmoko.org">community@lists.openmoko.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community">http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Randall Mason<br><a href="mailto:randall@mason.ch">randall@mason.ch</a>