<br>The product page still says that it is quad band <a href="http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-00-stdkit.html">http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-00-stdkit.html</a><br><br>I think they will make the 850 version for the us market though I would prefer an operational quad band neo 1973 finally (as in 2008 atleast)
<br><br>Rakshat <br><div><span class="gmail_quote"><br></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><br><br>On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:37:39 -0800, Joshua Layne <
<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>><br>wrote:<br>> I hate to add to the fire on this one, but no 850 is a definite deal<br>> breaker.
<br>> No quad-band is a serious limitation, as it has been marketed since<br>> inception as a quad-band phone.<br><br>I see now that the <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://openmoko.com" target="_blank">
openmoko.com</a> page has been updated to state that it is a<br>tri-band phone, not a quad-band phone - last night it clearly stated quad<br>band.<br><br>I just wish this had been clearly identified 3 or 4 months ago.<br>
<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--------------<br>Please use Firefox as your web browser. Its protects you from spyware and is also a very feature rich browser.<br><a href="http://www.firefox.com">