A quick search of my list archive found this:<br><br>"On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 2:38 AM, David Lefty Schlesinger <<a href="mailto:lefty@access-company.com">lefty@access-company.com</a>> wrote:<br>
Graffiti (as it pertains to handwriting systems) is a registered
trademark of ACCESS Systems Americas, not a generic term; you want to
find some alternate terminology.<br>
<br>
Sorry, gotta point it out, it's part of my job..."<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Msquared <<a href="mailto:announce.lists.openmoko@msquared.id.au">announce.lists.openmoko@msquared.id.au</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:13:55PM +0200, arne anka wrote:<br>
<br>
> regarding the question, who owns graffiti 1, see:<br>
> > <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_%28Palm_OS%29" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_(Palm_OS)</a><br>
<br>
</div>Looks like Xerox owns the patent. If it's still 17 years for a patent,<br>
that patent will still be valid for 5 or so years.<br>
<br>
I wonder if Xerox would be interested in allowing open source projects to<br>
use their invention without fee?<br>
<br>
Regards, Msquared...<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openmoko community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:community@lists.openmoko.org">community@lists.openmoko.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community" target="_blank">http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>