I still wonder what's so new about this?<br>Standby had some bugs (especially when waking up after doing suspend without reboot multiple times), but I'm sure that even in 2007 my GTA01 did over 20h in standby (only).<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <<a href="mailto:mickey@openmoko.org">mickey@openmoko.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Am Donnerstag 03 Juli 2008 00:31:21 schrieb Tim Knapp:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 00:19 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:<br>
> > Thanks for the experiment, Marc!<br>
> ><br>
> > Most of the honor is due our kernel wizards extraordinaire, of course.<br>
> ><br>
> > With the recently posted NO_IDLE_HZ support and (perhaps) some of the<br>
> > cpufreq patches, I'd expect even more.<br>
><br>
> Does this mean we can expect similar battery life gains from the 'other'<br>
> images?<br>
<br>
</div>For now, yes, I would expect so, since we are not doing any special things in<br>
the FSO-image -- yet :)<br>
<br>
(After the next couple of feature-release milestones, we're going to take<br>
going to strip init down to only run services that are actually in use, which<br>
should also have a nice impact on battery live).<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">:M:<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openmoko community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:community@lists.openmoko.org">community@lists.openmoko.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community" target="_blank">http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>