<div dir="ltr">On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Nishit Dave <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stargazer.dave@gmail.com">stargazer.dave@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">And by the way, what do Openmoko have to say about the FR?<br><br><a href="http://www.openmoko.com/product.html#" target="_blank">http://www.openmoko.com/product.html#</a><br><br>The only (implied) warning one could have come across in the early days of the launch was the *Community Portal*, which is the wiki, saying that this was a developer release of the FR. So how many phone purchase decisions are made on the basis of a *community portal's* hint, when the corporate and reseller websites do not point out that it is an experimental device at all?<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>Sorry for the chain of posts, but when I bought the phone, IDA Systems claimed it had a 500 MHz processor. Now they have corrected their website to say it is 400 MHz.<br><br>Are we trying to promote openness here, or damage it?<br>
</div>