<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Xavier Bestel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:xavier.bestel@free.fr">xavier.bestel@free.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 16:58 +0530, Nishit Dave wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
> All this discussion does not help if you realize that even after<br>
> placing the FR *next* to the blooming router, you get reported a<br>
> signal strength of 65%. What does the hardware expect, building the<br>
> router *inside* the FR?<br>
<br>
</div>Note that interferences may weaken an otherwise perfectly good signal.<br>
So the proximity isn't always synonymous with good signal strengh.<br>
<br>
Xav<br>
</blockquote></div><br>No?<br></div>