my 2 cents: if the porting of android will need the intervention of the low level developers this shouldn't be done. the kernel coders need all the time they need to understand and optimize the low level code. if meanwhile there are other developers who feel they can handle the port it could be just another option, and would be wrong not to try it..<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Nicola Mfb <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicola.mfb@gmail.com">nicola.mfb@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2008/10/22 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rms@1407.org" target="_blank">rms@1407.org</a>></span><div class="Ih2E3d"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 03:23:56PM -0700, Jim Morris wrote:<br>
> No magic, I suspect the kernel will be the same, and have potentially the same bugs, however I think<br>
> the apps will be more stable.<br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div>Exactly! this is a tipical scenario showing why openmoko inc. should spend the big part of it's resources on the kernel.<br>All the above, 2008.x, fso, qtopia, and now android will depend on it.<br>
<font color="#888888">
</font></blockquote></div><br>