Hmm, that is one very aspect of C++ I wasn't aware of.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/24 David Ford <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@blue-labs.org">david@blue-labs.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
that is one typical aspect.<br>
<br>
Michal Brzozowski wrote:<br>
> 2009/6/24 David Ford <<a href="mailto:david@blue-labs.org">david@blue-labs.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:david@blue-labs.org">david@blue-labs.org</a>>><br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">><br>
> do you understand the weight involved with using c++? without<br>
> very very<br>
> careful management, c++ is rather hefty for embedded devices.<br>
> granted,<br>
> having 128M to work in is indeed far more tenable than smaller devices<br>
> but it's still onerous.<br>
><br>
> C is much more lightweight and very functional. any benefits of c++<br>
> usually don't overcome the drawbacks for embedded devices.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> What drawbacks do you mean? That is uses more memory?<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Openmoko community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:community@lists.openmoko.org">community@lists.openmoko.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community" target="_blank">http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>