2009/8/11 Paul Fertser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fercerpav@gmail.com">fercerpav@gmail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Mikhail Umorin <<a href="mailto:mikeumo@gmail.com">mikeumo@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
>> > But I think you should still not assume that every Neo owner has<br>
>> > access to the #1024 GSM fix necessary for the 140 hour standby time.<br>
>><br>
>> Should i also refrain from assuming every Neo owner has access to some<br>
>> *nix box? Or to ssh client? This might make sense _if_ Neo wasn't a<br>
>> geek/hacker/developer device. But it is so its users are supposed to<br>
>> be able to solve small riddles along their ways to freedom.<br>
><br>
> Paul, I think you are missing the risk part of it: if I screw up in software I<br>
> can just reflash the device if I break a tiny piece of hardware -- my $400 fr<br>
> is gone.<br>
<br>
</div>I'm somehow certain that's a wrong assumption. Unless you do something<br>
really cruel you're not likely to foobar the whole device. Also even<br>
some fatal mistake will cost you less than $400 because the prices<br>
really dropped lately.<br></blockquote><div><br>I think I've read an email on this group from someone who broke their LCD by trying to do the #1024 fix. The geek inside me will gladly wait for one of the resellers to offer the fix.<br>
</div></div><br>