I personally really like paroli, but dont see the need for a completely separate distro for it.<br>I would like to see more work being done to integrating paroli as an phone-util option into shr (Perhaps down the road even integrating c_c's 'launcher' idea as a part of it?)<br>
That would be the ideal phone environment for me. <br><br>But I'm probably biased as I use SHR-U as my daily phone. ;)<br><br>Thanks for all the work on paroli and om2009 though Angus! <br>As I mentioned above, I really like paroli, and appreciate all the hard work you have put in thus far and hope that you continue!<br>
Paroli as a quick and responsive phone utility is certainly an asset to the om community!<br><br>Thanks,<br>-Dan Staley<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Angus Ainslie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nytowl@openmoko.org">nytowl@openmoko.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi All,<br>
<br>
I've been encouraged by a couple of persistent community members to post an<br>
update to Om2009. First ( other than taking some time off for the summer ) I'll<br>
tell you what I've been working on.<br>
<br>
I've been working on getting the 2.6.30 kernel with openwrt patches running.<br>
After a dismal failure earlier in the month I now have a running system. You<br>
can download experimental images to see its current state. I believe it is<br>
building and running most days.<br>
<br>
There are two caveats to using the bleeding edge experimental.<br>
<br>
1) SD card are failing to mount on occasion. This may be due to patches missed<br>
by me or a function of Om2009 versus openwrt booting.<br>
<br>
2) fsousaged crashes whenever it gets a suspend message. I've traced it to the<br>
point of fso_usage_low_level_suspend getting called with a NULL argument. So<br>
for a working phone suspend will need to be disabled for now.<br>
<br>
I'd like feedback from anyone brave enough to try it.<br>
<br>
Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.<br>