<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Al Johnson schrieb:
<blockquote cite="mid:200909111504.56562.openmoko@mazikeen.demon.co.uk"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Friday 11 September 2009, Matthias Huber wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Today i did another test, because i patched qi with ghex for giving the
kernel
loglevel=0, and my result today (look at the bottom for version) was:
ONE Ring until i get shr-todays slider to see.
That is ok for me. On that there is the question:
Why is qi delivered on the repo with debuglevel 4 ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Because it's a fair tradeoff between speed and getting some debug information
if something goes wrong? If booting from SD the loglevel is easily changed
anyway. It would be just as easy for NAND if Qi could read jffs2. You can also
change the loglevel at runtime as suggested in the shr tweak/customisation
guides. This will be just as effective for resume, but not as fast for boot.
</pre>
</blockquote>
i stated the question as "advicatus diaboli" for the normal user,
which wants to use the phone as daily.<br>
<br>
and i suggest to change qi, because, as you said above, it is:<br>
1. easily chanchable upon runtime for the developer<br>
2. faster for the normal daily use<br>
3. qi can with power-key hold give you a loglevel of 8.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>