Hi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ccc94453@vip.cybercity.dk">ccc94453@vip.cybercity.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:11:04PM +0000, Niels Heyvaert wrote:<br>
<br>
> The idea of having a simple GUI boot loader could be very useful...<br>
<br>
</div> We have one. It's called U-Boot. Or am I missing something?<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br>Apart for a fact that it has problem loading kernels over a certain size? Or that it requires the kernel on a separate partition (which must be fat?)?<br>
No, I don't think so.<br><br>But this begs the question: could U-boot be improved to deal with the current requirements of the users?<br></div></div>-- <br>Regards,<br>Torfinn Ingolfsen<br>