Hi guys !<div>I don't want to feed the troll but lets compare what's comparable ...</div><div>You compare Qt framebuffer with E over Xorg ... In one case you have a Xorg who is running in the other it's directly accessed ...</div>
<div>To compare, let's take ( for example :) ) Qalee it run a Qt over Xorg with transparency, ... </div><div>When developing it I've made some tests, everything that's move on the screen is slooow and it's even more slow when we have transparency effect applied. So during the development I've banned scrolling and thinks that are moving. The feedback I received is that it's more fast than other thinks ( except Qtmoko, no X ).<br>
I personally think the problem is not the toolkit ( but no, I don't like E ), I think Qt can do the same thinks (or more?) as fast as Enlightenment It's the way it's developed. We have an hardware that is slow for some reason ( graphic drivers ?, hardware problem?, ... ), we have to work with it ( and think how get can improve it ), so don't take "an application that work on other hardware" and push it as it on the phone and complain it's slow, if you like E, just remove thinks that doesn't work on the freerunner ... or use Qalee :)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Christophe<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>------------------------------<br><br>Openmoko phone gui :<br><br><a href="http://www.qalee.org">http://www.qalee.org</a><br>( Last alpha before first stable core release coming soon )
</div><div><br></div>