<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
06.11.2009 08:32, Shaz :
<blockquote
cite="mid:7b740b700911052332o7d1dac86t58d68b2871f689ee@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Paul
Fertser <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:fercerpav@gmail.com">fercerpav@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">a dehqan <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dehqan65@gmail.com">dehqan65@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
> 3 - Problem is that : our religion Eslam says you can use a person<br>
> code while he/she allows you , now There are codes and wiki and<br>
> .. on Google host .Even google is not owner of codes , Host
pertains<br>
> to google . So using that address and host is not possible for<br>
> moslems now .<br>
<br>
</div>
I can't exactly follow the logic. You said google doesn't want you to<br>
use their site. In fact i doubt that's true. They don't care if you<br>
use their site or not; they implemented that "restriction" solely to<br>
make some US jerks happy and to not have any problems with their<br>
inappropriate legislation. Also you should note that google is not a<br>
person, it's a large corporation functioning in a complex<br>
international environment. So even if they say they're prohibiting<br>
something it doesn't mean they actually do (and in fact they can't)<br>
and/or want it.<br>
<br>
I hope someone more skilled in Islam than me can clarify this matter<br>
from a religious POV but judging on common grounds it's perfectly<br>
moral to circumvent an artificial restriction especially given that<br>
restricting anybody is not intended.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
In simple words Google cannot give you something directly and you have
to get it through the third party because the first party wants to give
it to you while an <i>influential</i> body above google is just
creating hurdles due to its own interests. So I guess there is no moral
issue to get it through a third party and Google has no benefit in
restricting it, infact it is going against their interest considering
the matter at hand.<br>
</blockquote>
and from the view of the license GPL, it is explicitely allowed to use
and modify this code.<br>
</body>
</html>