<div><font color="#000000">> Cristophe you finally succeed in using dbus trough network? that's awesome!! :)<br></font></div>
<div>Yes, I'm working on that ! I'm able to call remote methode, remote methodes with arguments and very soon remote methodes that return some values .. </div><div>There is just connection to remote signals and build in security missing ...</div>
<div><br>> yes I have read about gabriel project before(two monts or so) was not<br>> updated since early 2008 now seems than a new maintainer has picked up<br>> the baton but not new commits yet.<br>> gabriels aproach is more secure but lacks a direct way to play with as<br>
> Cristoph proposal :) and lazy as I am I will love to play with qalee<br>> integrated remote dbus :), I have to take a look to boxee(<a href="http://boxee.tv/" target="_blank">boxee.tv</a>) to<br>> see if it has a dbus interfaces to play with too :)<br>
</div>
<div>I didn't know about this project before, but I think they are different. What I want to do I to propose a simple access to the remote bus with build in encryption and interface filter. I don't want to share an entire bus .. Shs approch is less hacking but could be harder to get it working. My project will be : Launch a daemon on the pc with a file with exported methode and a password as argument (or setted via dbus), launch a daemon with a password as argument (or setted via dbus) on the phone (or what ever you want)</div>
<div>and access the remote bus via a single methode, you'll know that you are calling a methode on a remote machine ...</div>
<div>I just want it to be simple, to use and to implement</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I know that dbus is able directly to be used on network but that's not easy to get it working, that's not documented and that's not secure ...<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid">?? gabriel *is* the direct way! you *are* on the remote dbus :) and<br>above all it run very nice with the freerunner too.<br>
I'm using it to develop veeery fast on my pc using FSO on the freerunner.<br><br>Oh, there is another solution (unmaintained due to few requests) to<br>control a remote Linux Box iniecting lowlevel uinput events (emulating<br>
keyboard and mouse, it runs on text vt too), or executing remote<br>commands (like dbus-send, etc.) :<br><br><a href="http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NIDE/NIDED" target="_blank">http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NIDE/NIDED</a><br>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>You can use the keyboard that come with the last release of qalee and my daemons for it ;) (the keyboard is based on dbus and is divided on two part (see svn, documentation soon))</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid"><br>and will be integrated in an upcoming Qt DE too.<br><br>That's only to say I'm sad that peoples did not join a common project.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>To join a project, you have to know about it ;) But I think that those differents approch can coexist, they are different to use. </div>
<div>If you don't like mine, I don't care, you are not obliged to use it, for me and other peoples it's utile as it is. That's free software :) </div>
<div>( For example I can say the same about Enlightenment ... I don't like it, their were kde, gnome, ... why people are developing for it instead of developing for other DE ? But I don't care, you have the choice to use what you want and develop for what you want ... )</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div><br>-- <br>------------------------------<br><br>Openmoko phone gui :<br><br><a href="http://www.qalee.org" target="_blank">http://www.qalee.org</a><br><br></div></div></blockquote></div>