<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Neil Jerram <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neil@ossau.homelinux.net" target="_blank">neil@ossau.homelinux.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">Simon Busch <<a href="mailto:morphis@gravedo.de">morphis@gravedo.de</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> I would be really happy to hear what other people are thinking about<br>
> the idea behind FSO since it was started back in 2008. What are your<br>
> missing features? What do you like and what not?<br>
<br>
</div>All of the details you've described sound to me like excellent and<br>
compelling things to work on.<br>
<br>
But your wider problem is that you're working in a vacuum, because<br>
there's no reasonably widely used phone distribution that uses FSO and<br>
that is also regularly and safely updated. That means you have no users<br>
for your incremental improvements.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Does QTMoko not use FSO now? If yet then Radek has a pretty usable upper layer out there now where end users can try out the improvements in FSO.</div><div><br></div><div>Rakshat </div>
</div>