x in om2007.2
Tilman Baumann
tilman at baumann.name
Tue Jul 29 12:30:58 CEST 2008
sparky mat wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Tilman Baumann <tilman at baumann.name
> <mailto:tilman at baumann.name>> wrote:
> X as a screen multiplexer is not too bad. Why bother?
>
>
> I gathered from this thread that its GTK+ that could use some
> optimizations? Esp. image caching?
Yea, there seems to be room for optimisation. EFL does it supposedly better.
The x11 protocol has some ugly pitfalls.
But i don't think render performance makes such a big difference.
Startup time and overall performance seems more important to me.
I think before we optimize render performance by throwing X away, we
have plenty of opportunities to make big improvements somewhere else
with bigger impact and lesser drawback.
--
Drucken Sie diese Mail bitte nur auf Recyclingpapier aus.
Please print this mail only on recycled paper.
More information about the devel
mailing list