x in om2007.2
tilman at baumann.name
Tue Jul 29 12:30:58 CEST 2008
sparky mat wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Tilman Baumann <tilman at baumann.name
> <mailto:tilman at baumann.name>> wrote:
> X as a screen multiplexer is not too bad. Why bother?
> I gathered from this thread that its GTK+ that could use some
> optimizations? Esp. image caching?
Yea, there seems to be room for optimisation. EFL does it supposedly better.
The x11 protocol has some ugly pitfalls.
But i don't think render performance makes such a big difference.
Startup time and overall performance seems more important to me.
I think before we optimize render performance by throwing X away, we
have plenty of opportunities to make big improvements somewhere else
with bigger impact and lesser drawback.
Drucken Sie diese Mail bitte nur auf Recyclingpapier aus.
Please print this mail only on recycled paper.
More information about the devel