x in om2007.2
max at sparkymat.net
Tue Jul 29 12:35:10 CEST 2008
I understand there's a "bug" in neod which causes cpu usage to shoot up
(well, not exactly a bug.. the accelerometers spew out too much data? 200
times per second? ) .. possibly, we could start there?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Tilman Baumann <tilman at baumann.name> wrote:
> sparky mat wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Tilman Baumann <tilman at baumann.name<mailto:
>> tilman at baumann.name>> wrote:
>> X as a screen multiplexer is not too bad. Why bother?
>> I gathered from this thread that its GTK+ that could use some
>> optimizations? Esp. image caching?
> Yea, there seems to be room for optimisation. EFL does it supposedly
> The x11 protocol has some ugly pitfalls.
> But i don't think render performance makes such a big difference. Startup
> time and overall performance seems more important to me.
> I think before we optimize render performance by throwing X away, we have
> plenty of opportunities to make big improvements somewhere else with bigger
> impact and lesser drawback.
> Drucken Sie diese Mail bitte nur auf Recyclingpapier aus.
> Please print this mail only on recycled paper.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel