to be closed

John Lee john_lee at
Tue Sep 9 11:19:57 CEST 2008

On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:35:36AM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2008 08:15:37 John Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder what's the pros and cons if we just branch off asu.testing
> > from and settle it in 2008.9 instead of
> > 2008.9+x(10)?
> Pros: Closer to and (meaning more and 
> updated packages)
> Cons: Upgrade path from 2008.8 to is untested, QA didn't test 
> images yet. didn't compile with 
> BB_GIT_CLONE_FOR_SRCREV until a few seconds ago, some one needs verify that 
> the right theme files etc... are used

I just did the 2008.8-update to testing ( repo upgrade and
everything seems to be fine.  The only hack I did was shutdown X and
delete ~/.e first before the upgrade.

> The cons include all the things that we will have to do for 2008.9+x and so 
> far no one has done them.

I'm confident we can create om2008 stable repo for 2009.9+x or even
2009.9 after I tried the upgrade above.


More information about the devel mailing list