[OSX] does a toolchain need to support NPTL for OM?
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
hns at computer.org
Thu Jan 8 22:30:23 CET 2009
Am 08.01.2009 um 21:56 schrieb Christopher Friedt:
> Hi again Niklaus,
> I made 2 small typos on my reply before
> 1) my target was not gnueabi, it was arm-softfloat-linux-gnu (only
> more recent versions of glibc / gcc / binutils support gnueabi)
Ok, that may be different in detail and the eabi part is important.
> 2) the glibc I used was version 2.3.2
That isn't much delta to 2.3.6.
> In case you feel like using an alternative libc called "newlib" or
> somethiing like glibc-2.6.1 (would likely work just as well), you can
> try out the following link:
Ah. Good pointer.
But (there is always a but :)
* has no Linux headers
* uses newlib
* is not eabi
So binaries may not be compatible unless I force users to install more
than they need.
> Just add objective-c to the "--enable-languages" option.
The key issue is that I want to build a toolchain that is binary
compatible with that what e.g. 2008.9 uses and provides in the rootfs.
Let's check again (it is some time ago that I checked).
It is (at least for 2008.9 - I have not tried for 2008.12):
So, it uses a libc-2.6.1 and this may compile correctly with ARM NPTL.
I will try this combination with NPTL and report...
Hm. glibc says "armv4tl not supported"... So I probably should stay
More information about the devel