[OSX] does a toolchain need to support NPTL for OM?
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
hns at computer.org
Fri Jan 9 23:09:18 CET 2009
:) :) :)
After doing some more magical tricks, now the glibc configure with
NPTL succeeds and the first phase gcc is being built!
So it appears that I have (a still incomplete) gcc that supports C
(but no C++ and Obj-C and of course no real glibc).
Next steps tomorrow...
Am 09.01.2009 um 16:28 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
> Am 09.01.2009 um 15:16 schrieb Christopher Friedt:
>> You should really just use nptl - they are built-in to glibc-2.6.
>> also an industry standard. I believe that it is not optional in this
>> version of glibc.
>> PS: If it helps at all, when I use gentoo/portage to automate the
>> build of glibc-2.6.1, the following files are downloaded:
>> # glibc-2.6.1 is the vanilla/official version
> Great! This one ^^^^^^^^appears the right place to look at!
> Approx. May 2005 they added a non-official part called 'ports' to
> glibc and that one contains a lot of arm-eabi and nptl stuff! So I
> will try to add this module to the vanilla sources.
More information about the devel