[OSX] does a toolchain need to support NPTL for OM?

[Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller]

:) :) :)

After doing some more magical tricks, now the glibc configure with  
NPTL succeeds and the first phase gcc is being built!

So it appears that I have (a still incomplete) gcc that supports C  
(but no C++ and Obj-C and of course no real glibc).

Next steps tomorrow...

Nikolaus

Am 09.01.2009 um 16:28 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:

>
> Am 09.01.2009 um 15:16 schrieb Christopher Friedt:
>
>> You should really just use nptl - they are built-in to glibc-2.6.  
>> It's
>> also an industry standard. I believe that it is not optional in this
>> version of glibc.
>>
>> C
>>
>> PS: If it helps at all, when I use gentoo/portage to automate the
>> build of glibc-2.6.1, the following files are downloaded:
>>
>> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/glibc-libidn-2.6.1.tar.bz2
>> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/glibc-2.6.1-patches-1.2.tar.bz2
>> # glibc-2.6.1 is the vanilla/official version
>> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/glibc-2.6.1.tar.bz2
>
>
>> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/glibc-ports-2.6.1.tar.bz2
>
> Great! This one ^^^^^^^^appears the right place to look at!
>
> Approx. May 2005 they added a non-official part called 'ports' to  
> glibc and that one contains a lot of arm-eabi and nptl stuff! So I  
> will try to add this module to the vanilla sources.
>
> Nikolaus