andreas.pokorny at gmail.com
Wed May 6 18:42:39 CEST 2009
2009/5/6 Thomas White <taw at bitwiz.org.uk>:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 14:13:28 +0200
> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars at metafoo.de> wrote:
>> In my opinion instead of exa we should use uxa which is exa without
>> memory management. And thats also whats intel is using now.
> Hmm, I haven't looked too closely at UXA yet, but I didn't think UXA would
> give us any advantages over EXA+pixmap creation hooks...?
I thought UXA is like EXA - with the same API - but with GEM for
More information about the devel