methril at gmail.com
Thu May 7 09:29:39 CEST 2009
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Andreas Pokorny
<andreas.pokorny at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/5/6 Thomas White <taw at bitwiz.org.uk>:
>> On Wed, 06 May 2009 14:13:28 +0200
>> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars at metafoo.de> wrote:
>>> In my opinion instead of exa we should use uxa which is exa without
>>> memory management. And thats also whats intel is using now.
>> Hmm, I haven't looked too closely at UXA yet, but I didn't think UXA would
>> give us any advantages over EXA+pixmap creation hooks...?
> I thought UXA is like EXA - with the same API - but with GEM for
> memory management.
And using DRI2, IIRC.
> kind regards
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.openmoko.org
o0 Methril 0o
More information about the devel