Glamo Speed Improvement(s) direcfb
taw at bitwiz.org.uk
Fri Nov 20 22:11:16 CET 2009
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:09:33 +0100
Thomas White <taw at bitwiz.org.uk> wrote:
> That probably indicates that something somewhere in DirectFB is making
> the invalid assumption that the visible framebuffer is the first thing
> in Glamo's VRAM.
Just in case anyone's watching: after a bit of off-list debugging, this
problem is now fixed. It was actually my fault.
Thomas White <taw at bitwiz.org.uk>
More information about the devel