Glamo Speed Improvement(s) direcfb

Thomas White taw at
Fri Nov 20 22:11:16 CET 2009

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:09:33 +0100
Thomas White <taw at> wrote:

> That probably indicates that something somewhere in DirectFB is making
> the invalid assumption that the visible framebuffer is the first thing
> in Glamo's VRAM.

Just in case anyone's watching:  after a bit of off-list debugging, this
problem is now fixed. It was actually my fault.


Thomas White <taw at>

More information about the devel mailing list