David Morris david at david-morris.co.uk
Mon Oct 31 13:56:56 CET 2011


Sent from my mobile

On 31 Oct 2011, at 09:09, Stefan Schmidt <stefan at datenfreihafen.org> wrote:

> Hello.
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 11:35, Tormod Volden wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> <stefan at datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>>> Di you try to do a git rebase -i on the branch and remove or squash
>>> some of the commits you want to get rid of? Due to the merges and your
>>> other changes I expect not all of the rebases will work. Maybe some
>>> will work out easily though.
>> I have tried and using -p, I still have to redo every merge conflict
>> resolve I had done in the original merges. Which I was hoping to
>> avoid, since squashing two commits does not change any code from there
>> on. Maybe "git rerere" is the answer? But it still requires me to redo
>> the merge conflict resolves once?
> I've given up after an hour as well. :(
> This remembers me why I normally have only short term branches and do
> even rebasing on them. Of course this has other disadvantages like
> loosing history. :(
>>> I don't want to put to much work on you for merging this in (you did
>>> already enough with implementing it). I find the problem interesting
>>> though and would like to play with it myself a bit. How about this?
>>> You try some rebase interactive if you are in the mood and I will also
>>> play with your original branch at the weekend. If nothing better shows
>>> up I will just merge you squashed merge from master-patches on sunday.
>> I spent some hours without luck, let's see if you get any further.
>> Otherwise, yes, let's use my squashed merge and move on.
> Agreed. It might still be possible to get this sorted out, but after
> both of us spending time on it I think it is not worth the effort.
> Better use the time for more productive things. :)
> Now for the review. I'm hapopy to see that they at least have choosen
> a different DFU version to distinguish DfuSe from standard DFU. I
> still need to get out the spec from the windows driver package to read
> up on it, but I trust you on this part anyway. I'm also happy to see
> how minimal the impact in main.c is to support this extension. (Thanks
> to all the ground work you did earlier).
> So, all in all I'm happy to get this merged. Test with my devices
> showed up no regressions. I pulled it into master and if no problems
> show up the next days will make a new release later this week. Thanks
> again for this major contribution!
> I wonder what would be the cheapest/easiast available device using DfuSe and
> being compatible with your implementation. A full pocket oscilloscope might
> be a bit overkill for playing with it. Any cheap devel board available
> having the DfuSe enabled bootloader installed?
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.openmoko.org
> https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

More information about the devel mailing list