<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Marcus Bauer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcus.bauer@gmail.com">marcus.bauer@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 13:26 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:<br>
> Am Sonntag 27 Juli 2008 09:52:57 schrieb sparky mat:<br>
> > kinda new here. i noticed that om2007.2 and asu are slower than qtopia<br>
> > (the one from trolltech, not the x11 port). i presume its partly<br>
> > because X is being used.<br>
><br>
> It's less a problem of X and more a problem of Gtk+ taking ages to (re)draw<br>
> things on the screen.<br>
<br>
</div>It is well known that you don't like GTK+ - fine. But just stop<br>
spreading your FUD against GTK+:<br>
<br>
a) GTK is quite snappy on the neo1973 (GTA01) thus the problem<br>
is not GTK but the limited memory bandwith on the<br>
Freerunner/GTA02 due to the glamo chip.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Why is this so (lesser memory bandwidth due to the glamo chip)? <br><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
b) the neod eats up to 60% CPU on the Freerunner (GTA02) because<br>
it opens all /dev/input/event* and thus it opens the<br>
accelerometers and get 200 interrupts per second - for<br>
absolutely nothing.<br>
<br>
But it massively slows down OM2007.2.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I am assuming neod is the "event" handler. So does it do polling or waiting for events? (Ok, I guess I should prolly start looking at the code :-) )</div></div><br>And unless I am mistaken, isnt this a whole another thread in the mailing list? I mean, high cpu-usage of neod? <br>
</div>