picoGUI on Neo
Ross Burton
ross at openedhand.com
Tue Dec 18 12:10:16 CET 2007
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 08:11 +0000, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 07:05 +0200, Mikael Lammentausta wrote:
> > It would probably be much more suitable for Neo's limited resources
> > than the X architecture, although compatibility and code reuse will
> > probably severely limit the available software. :(
>
> Although this is open repeated, remember that Neo has several times more
> computing power and memory than the machines that X was originally
> written and used on.
Thanks to Iain for pointing this out to me:
http://www.picogui.org/News/News_Item.2003-10-27.html
"I'm sure some of you have guessed by now that the PicoGUI project isn't
going anywhere."
Considering it isn't maintained and hasn't been released since 2003,
it's probably a bad idea.
Ross
--
OpenedHand Ltd.
Unit R Homesdale Business Center / 216-218 Homesdale Road /
Bromley / BR1 2QZ / UK Tel: +44 (0)20 8819 6559
Expert Open Source For Consumer Devices - http://o-hand.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/framework-devel/attachments/20071218/ebc36962/attachment.pgp
More information about the framework-devel
mailing list