[gta02-core] More symbols - FA2012, RT9711 and DTC123

[Rene Harder]

Werner Almesberger wrote:
>> Why clockwise? I would go for counter-clockwise (pin 1 bottom, left),
>> thats what ON, NXP and Diode is using, so 3:1. ;-)
>>     
>
> Argh. I hate those single-bit data corruptions. Yes, that's what
> I meant.
>
>   

I changed the symbol accordingly and put a note in the STATUS file that
we use a different pin numbering than ROHM.

> So I guess we should be fine with one of the regular SOT-416
> footprints. ON Semi use 0.508 x 0.356 mm [1], NXP are a bit
> more generous with 0.6 x 0.5 mm [2].
>   

Yes I think the SOT416 should work, we don't need footprints where the
pads are 3 times as big as the actual pin size.