<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Werner Almesberger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:werner@openmoko.org">werner@openmoko.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Luke Duncan wrote:<br>
> I checked in an initial shot at the IO schematics<br>
<br>
</div>Thanks ! I had a quick look. The hierarchical labels look a bit<br>
ugly. Besides, we don't use them anywhere else and they would be<br>
rather painful in our context. So I'd suggest to use global labels<br>
for things that are shared across sheets, and local labels for<br>
things that are sheet-local but don't have a direct connection.<br>
<br>
For local labels, you just make a single-ended "wire", put the<br>
label on top, and KiCad will know that this is the same as any<br>
other net on the same sheet with the same label.</blockquote><div><br> I'm confused here. I used the "Add Global Label" button to add the labels. Double-clicking the label also opens the global label properties box. I'm not sure where the hierarchical labels are; maybe I'm just unfamiliar with Kicad.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
And two minor things:<br>
<br>
- KiCad doesn't remove junctions when you remove "wires", so you<br>
have to delete them manually. (E.g., on top of D4601 and 550 mil<br>
on the right of that one.)</blockquote><div><br>Fixed. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
- regarding D4601 and D4602, I think it's better to place them<br>
next to the vibrator, even if this means that the "wires" cross,<br>
because that shows their function more clearly.</blockquote><div><br>Ok, done. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
- it would be nice if you could put the parameters of varistors<br>
in the symbol, like on the USB sheet.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Done. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
- please don't forget the component references of SC32442/E and<br>
SC32442/N<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Duh. Fixed.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
- The text inside the FH23-39S connector doesn't fit. Maybe put<br>
the reference on top of the box and rotate the name ? Or just<br>
make the box a bit wider.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I didn't pick up the symbol for the debug connector from SVN. Dave, can you make sure this is added to the repository? <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
- components sitting on top of "wires" (e.g., TP4714) don't look<br>
right (no junction) and may actually not make contact. Better<br>
make the branch just with "wires".</blockquote><div><br>Agreed. Fixed. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<font color="#888888">- Werner<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br>Let me know if you spot anything else.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Luke.<br>