Hi,<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Werner Almesberger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:werner@openmoko.org">werner@openmoko.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Dave Ball wrote:<br>
> Between those two - I prefer ODH. We are using copyleft licenses,<br>
> so that's accurate, but that phrase always sounds a little<br>
> anti-establishment to me.<br>
<br>
</div>Yup, good point. If you want to change the system from within, you<br>
better hide the molotov cocktails and the balaclava in a nice<br>
briefcase :)</blockquote><div><br></div><div>"These aren't the droids you are looking for" ;)</div><div><br></div><div>I like ODH over copyleft hardware -- because I'm not sure most hardware can be thought of as "copyright eligible". </div>
<div><br></div><div>Open Design Hardware describes the purpose very well. There are far too many "open" bodies that are really just pushing their own standard, unfortunately.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">> ps - what's Quorum for this kind of decision? :-p<br>
<br>
</div>Something like 2-3 more votes, I'd say :)<br>
<br>
The art of controlling democracy - everybody gets to vote, but you<br>
decide when the election is over and whether it's valid.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, I don't know if a lurker vote counts, but mine is for ODH.</div><div><br></div><div>G</div></div></div>