gta02-core component drawings (was Re: GTA02-core)

[Joerg Reisenweber]

Am Di  12. Mai 2009 schrieb Dave Ball:
> Werner Almesberger wrote:
> > Wonderful, thanks a lot ! I put your files into the Openmoko SVN at
> > http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/gta02-core/components/
> Great - Thanks.
> > Regarding the repository structure, how about making one set of
> > files (.lib and .dcm) per component and merging them into a
> > library of everything by script ? I think this would make it easier
> > to keep track of changes.
> >   
> Sure, I'll split them into multiple libraries.  What's the benefit of 
> then merging them back into a library of everything?
> > I had a quick look at them. Comments in another mail. There are
> > also two items that may need a policy.
> >   
> Fab.  I was in general trying to keep the components similar to the 
> existing gta02 models, to minimise transposition mistakes when we're 
> re-creating the schematics.  That leads me to a question about the CPU - 
> you mentioned doing that as multi-part, but I wasn't sure how much it 
> makes sense to break it up.  There seems to be potentially 19 discrete 
> interfaces:
> 
> Memory, SDRAM, NAND, DMA
> UART, SPI, SDIO, USB, JTAG, EINT, EINT+, IIC, IIS, ADC/TSP
> LCD, Camera, Clock, Timer
> Power
> 
> Does it make more sense to have a 'part' for each of those 19, group 
> them as I have (mem, IO, peripherals, power), or do something 
> different?  Is there value in re-creating the part exactly as it's drawn 
> in the current GTA02 schematics to minimise silly copying errors?

I think Werner is talking about the layers of the SoC.
/j
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/gta03/attachments/20090512/787bf22e/attachment.pgp