AT%SLEEP=n power consumption

"Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" mail at
Tue Oct 21 00:59:31 CEST 2008

Alastair Johnson wrote:
> I thought the idea was to make GSM usable for people suffering from 
> #1024 :-) Mickey suggests the bandaid may make power consumption worse 
> in comment 45.
> I may have missed something, but I haven't seen any hard evidence on the 
> effect of #1024 on power consumption. Werner's results show the 
> difference between SLEEP=4 and SLEEP=2 for a phone without #1024.

Well my phone doesn't seem to suffer of that bug, but using a the
SLEEP=2 mode it seems to consume a lot also in suspend state.
I've not been able to get again 2 days of usage without recharging.

Treviño's World - Life and Linux

More information about the hardware mailing list