GSM-noise "buzz" issue / ways forward

[Joerg Reisenweber]

Am Mo  22. September 2008 schrieb Andy Green:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> 
> | and *then* continue to look for good fixes for already existing ones,
> this
> | request gets torn down by an immediate vivid discussion about
> contamination
> | pathes etc., leaving impression to TPE EE we are not on same page
> about doing
> | new PCB to include EMI-filters on 3 contacts of JK4401.
> 
> If we're making an A8 today we should add them, solely on the basis
> that's the only thing we found that affects it at all.  But, I don't
> think we make an A8 today.
> 
> What we need to increase our understanding of the whole problem if we
> can in the meanwhile and see if we can find more attacks elsewhere and a
> different way to come at it.  That is why the difficult question about
> paths keeps returning.  Really the bead impact is clue to the larger
> problem structure, not a solution in itself (although if we don't get
> any further, that's all we have to play with).
> 
> -Andy
> 

I definitively resign.
/j

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/hardware/attachments/20080922/feee47e4/attachment-0001.pgp