<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Andy Green <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andy@openmoko.com">andy@openmoko.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Steady on, that OMAP device is marginally slower vs s3c6410 CPU, 600 vs<br>633MHz. And it's hard to say that Samsung "doesn't care about open<br>
source the slightest bit", they did go to the trouble to make the BSP<br>available for Linux. By the time we're done with them they will have<br>mainline support for it.<br></blockquote>
<div>Ok, let's hope samsung becomes better in this area, so this is ok for me.</div>
<div>But isn't the cortex with 600 mhz faster than the arm11 with 633?</div>
<div>Another thing is, that the OMAP3 core has (afaik) bigger caches than the S3C.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><span id=""></span><br>OMAP has this sexy DSP business, but the Glamo has all kinds of<br>coprocessors that will never get used. 6410 is going to make a<br>
satisfying basis for a smart device I think.<br></blockquote>
<div>Did I get this right? GTA04 will get the same glamo we GTA02 owners know?</div>
<div>Will it be good enough with the new connections of the S3C64xx, even if the other limitations (blitting only 512x512) are still existant?</div></div></div>