Fwd: debian etch chroot, fix!

[Brian Brunswick]

On 03/08/07, Brian Brunswick <brian at ithil.org> wrote:
> armel seems like the best bet for performance indeed. I didn't know it was
> so far along.
>

But of course, armel doesn't work either with the current kernel, since armel
seems to change the syscall interface to always use SWI 0, and pass the
syscall in a register for extra speed.  (Slight change in 64 bit
argument passing
convention too I read)

So we would need a kernel compiled with that option too.

Please include one or the other of these options, since the ability to
chroot and use
pre-compiled software is pretty handy.

-- 
Brian_Brunswick____brian at ithil.org____Wit____Disclaimer____!Shortsig_rules!