3D support?

Chris Andrew cjhandrew at gmail.com
Sat Jul 5 21:47:31 CEST 2008


Surely this is why we need  to check all software/ hardware licences,
so we can concentrate our efforts on finding alternatives, in order to
make the device truly free.

Cheers,

Chris.

2008/7/5 Jay Vaughan <jayv at synth.net>:
>> that's very sad to read! I just bought my FreeRunner just this week
>> because
>> I head on seeral talk that "all docs are free" (except GSM stack, I don't
>> care)
>> and now this ?
>>
>
> yeah, get over it though, if you make too big a deal out of it, the machine
> itself will probably break in your hands.
>
> for sure, the /software/ aspect of openmoko is more open than the hardware.
>  such is the nature of all hardware.
>
>> oh well, I should have read the wiki more detailed before beleaving those
>> talks...
>> or are there any plans for a "solution" for this issue ??
>
>
> on gp2x, another arm was pressed into doing defacto 3d and it turned out
> great.  i think the 3d accel unit on freerunner is borked by the
> memory/interface bottleneck, and it thus becomes impractical to use.
>
> ;
> --
> Jay Vaughan
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:

http://www.getgnulinux.org/



More information about the openmoko-devel mailing list