Doc Confusion re Source for FSO?
rod at whitby.id.au
Fri Jul 11 10:28:01 CEST 2008
Jeff Rush wrote:
> 1. MokoMakefile comes with:
> but the instructions at the following wiki page:
> say to change that to:
> Where is the actual source code for FSO being kept these days, OM or OE?
The bleeding edge FSO is in OE I believe. Mickey told me that he
doesn't even have write acess to the OM git repository.
But OE and OM sync regularly (done by Graeme I believe).
> 2. When running "make setup" for a fresh environment, I see that it does
> a lot of SVN checkouts of OM-2007.2 before getting to the stage of
> selecting ASU, FSO or GTK. Is it really necessary to pull down stuff
> that may not be used?
Probably not, but working out in advance whether you're going to build
one or the other is a bit hard, and the SVN repositories are not
structured such that you can easily checkout just the bits required for
one image or another.
> 3. On Micky's blog, Mickey says that Rod has added "framework-image" as
> a target to get an FSO build, but there is no such target. There is an
> "fso" target though.
I expect framework-image would be referring a Bitbake recipe that Mickey
is referring to. Mickey (being an OE core developer) doesn't use the
More information about the openmoko-devel