I think people are just being busy, or posting to other lists.<br><br>/CM<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Phil Schaffner</b> <<a href="mailto:P.R.Schaffner@ieee.org">P.R.Schaffner@ieee.org
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 09:59 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:<br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<br>> Hash: SHA1<br>><br>> Koen Kooi schreef:<br>> > Werner Almesberger schreef:<br>> >> Rod Whitby wrote:<br>> >>> Whether or not you agree with the OpenMoko core dev's decision to use
<br>> >>> the "svnnow" functionality,<br>> >> Don't worry, we hate it too :-) It's just the lesser evil for now,<br>> >> since we have quite a number of things that change very rapidly,
<br>> ><br>> > Looking at at the rate of svn commits your definition of 'very rapidly' differs<br>> > wildy from mine, moko has ~90 commits per week (including changes to trunk/oe,<br>> > not the source code!), 'very rapidly' would be 90 commits per *day*. The only
<br>> > thing that changes (not even rapidly) is uboot. And uboot is not something 90%<br>> > of the developers want to build. And a large part of the remaining commits seem<br>> > to get reverted when someone tries to build it.
<br>><br>> And those number include 29 commits to mokomakefile as well.<br><br>Given the extraordinarily quiet state of openmoko-devel, distro-devel,<br>and the fact that my last 4 posts to openmoko-devel and my last one to
<br>community seem to have gone to the bit-bucket, either the core people<br>are too busy to respond or something is seriously broken with the lists.<br><br>Phil<br><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>