<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM, KlaymenDK <<a href="mailto:jan%2Bopenmoko@g-b.dk">jan+openmoko@g-b.dk</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
- It would be nice to have the option to not have a 'heartbeat' blinker. A few<br>
of my friends have phones that do that, and I find it really annoying.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I actually like it, but do see it as a knob that should have the option to be turned off.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
- About the "increased blinking" as the charge level of the battery increases,<br>
I wonder if this means increasing *frequency*, or increasing blink *duration*?<br>
Personally, I think I would prefer the latter. Quickly blinking lights might<br>
be stressful.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm not sure how doable it is, but rather then blinking, perhaps it could slowly fade up and down, akin to how some of the Mac stuff does, like iMacs and Macbooks, to let you know they are powered up but LCD is off?</div>
<div><br></div><div>I know technically it's possible, but I'm not sure if the electronics/kernel bits support steps or just a simple on/off. An answer on this would facilitate more discussion.</div><div><br></div>
<div>Gerald.</div></div>