Merging openmoko changes upstream
laforge at openmoko.org
Wed Apr 11 04:37:42 CEST 2007
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:35:30PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Prime candidate would be gta01-backlight patch. #ifdef killing is easy
> > > > > enough to do, and should allow upstream merge. When all the
> > > > > gta01-... are merged, gta01-core can be sent to rmk...
> > > >
> > > > First of all, Ben is still waiting for a reply from rmk on whether GTA01
> > > > can be renamed to 'neo1973'. This rename would affect all patches, so
> > > > this needs to be first.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I think it is entirely upon us how we want our machine to be
> > > named.
> > But GTA01 is already a registered name for the machine type at the arm
> > machine registry. That name predates neo1973
> > > Actually I'd preger 'neo' -- we don't really want all those numbers
> > > and neo1974 is a bit unlikely, right?
> > neo1978 however is. 'neo' is way too unspecific and will apply to many
> > products on the roadmap.
> Hmm, if neo1978 follows after neo1973... I guess gta01/gta02 are
> better names after all. They are shorter, and _way_ easier to
no, it's different. Both GTA01 and GTA02 are Neo1973 ;0
Sorry. Believe me, we are thinking hard about this, and it is being
taken care of.
rm has been asked to rename MACH_GTA01 to MACH_NEO1973_GTA01 and
MACH_NEO1973_GTA02, which is the only logical, precise and conclusive
way for naming. The same naming scheme will be followed further down
- Harald Welte <laforge at openmoko.org> http://openmoko.org/
Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone
More information about the openmoko-kernel