[PATCH Try#2] introduce-fiq-hdq.patch

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> Andy Green wrote:
>> Makes no sense to me :-)  Whatever string we have in there won't get us
>> "burned".  If the branding changes we just sed it and there are no
>> dependencies.  Oh well, *shrug*.
> 
> Yeah, it's just extra work. Someone does the editing, posts a patch,
> someone else reviews is, checks it in, makes an upstream patch,
> upstream looks a it, applies it, weeks later it trickles back, so we
> need to remove it from our patch set, etc. Maybe it even breaks
> someone's patch context, causing more work and introducing a patch
> order dependency, and so on.
> 
> Takes a few minutes out of everyone's lives for no good reason.

Well there is a reason, I would definitely want my branding getting into
mainline if it was possible.  But no problem, I held a private ceremony
and had a quiet moment for that line of diff already :-)

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHssmFOjLpvpq7dMoRAhauAJwMaffK2iQR1MePXfuBwYPFysaq6wCaAvX7
OF7+ylFDdnpE2S2XWJECcCA=
=KR4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----