Big update in stable / nspy and serial fixes

Mike (mwester) mwester at
Thu Jul 3 17:06:47 CEST 2008

Andy Green wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | |> Again, the nspy part is but 3 of the entire patchset that got dumped
> | |> out.  I think it's rather useful, but if this all it takes to keep it
> |
> | Great, why don't we forget about nspy stuff for now.  Nothing is "dumped
> ...
> | Well, let me take a closer look with this "nspy is only 3 of my 17
> | patches" in mind.  The invasive aspect of nspy is the biggest problem,
> | if we move that out for another time it will only help.
> nspy calls seem to be embedded throughout the other patches too.
> I don't really understand your code yet, but what I am doing at the
> moment is removing the three patches with nspy in the name and then
> going through removing all the nspy calls in the other patches using
> only the blinding light of my ignorance to guide me.
> If that sounds like a bad idea to you, let me know.

It doesn't sound like a good use of your time, honestly.

At this point, just remove all the "mw" patches from the andy branch
entirely.  I'll submit a patch to pull out the remaining fragments of
those patches from the stable to clean that out entirely.

And then when I have time (this weekend, perhaps) I'll re-do the patch
sets on separate branches on my site, and those interested can figure
out which particular patches they find acceptable and of interest as
time goes on.

> - -Andy
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
> iEYEARECAAYFAkhs5Z4ACgkQOjLpvpq7dMquFwCeNQ8TJNb8BcJ3lXv6042GPwTV
> l/0AniULhxXvkyuz8tBIpalPZTFJJtxX
> =2ugU

Mike (mwester)

More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list